Skip to main content

Minimum Standard

 You can't define your morality by criminal law.


Ok?


The 'criminal threshold' (my term, as far as I know) delineates the minimum standard of behaviour we will tolerate as a civilization.  Crimes - such as fraud, arson, assault - are unacceptable behaviours, and our social contract is such that we will not turn a blind eye to their committal or let individuals decide for themselves when they may be justified.  They are simply not done, or at least, we try to make sure they are not done.


One is not a 'good person' because one does not commit crimes or, to broaden the scope, violate the law of the land.  It's not like everything below the criminal threshold is heinous and everything above is saintly.  You can't think that way.  A moral person strives to bring about the most good and live in adherence with correct principals.  There are many acts that, while legal, are all the same immoral.


Test yourself.  Test your morality.  Do you live according to principals?  Try to think of an act that you would like to commit, but will not, because it is wrong.  A legal act.  It's a total cop out to pick something illegal: "Oh, I would like to kill such and such a politician, because he's such an idiot and is making our country a worse place, but that is wrong."  Come on.  Of course it's wrong.  You are not moral because you won't do the worst thing possible.  Nor are you moral if you abstain from wrongs that you don't care about.


But what is something that is totally legal that you will not do?  Something that may provide you with some sort of pleasure or catharsis, or improve your circumstances, or make life easier for you.  But that you realize is wrong.  Perhaps it's certain financial practices, use of certain language, medical procedures, corporal violations in any form, substance use, occupational promotion, etc.  Can you identify one?  Or several?


If not, take a good look at yourself.  I would submit you are not a moral individual.  I would submit that restraint is an essential part of mortality.


How do you act when you are free to do so without negative consequence?  That will define your morality.

Comments